Comparison · April 2026
Rills vs OpenClaw
Two approaches to workflow automation. See how they compare on features, pricing, and philosophy.
Pick Rills if you need team-ready workflow automation with structured approvals, multi-tenancy, and predictable action credit pricing.
Pick OpenClaw if you want a self-hosted personal AI assistant with broad system access and pass-through LLM costs.
Full comparison
Pricing model
- Rills
- Base subscription from $29/month plus included workflow & AI credits; logic & approvals free
- OpenClaw
- Open-source (MIT, self-host free) or OpenClaw Cloud at $59/mo; all LLM API costs are pass-through to your provider
Free / entry
- Rills
- Free trial; paid plans from Hobby tier (see rills.ai/pricing for tiers and included credits)
- OpenClaw
- Open source: $0 to install; practical cost $6-13/mo for basic self-hosting (VPS + OSS models). See getopenclaw.ai/pricing
AI capabilities
- Rills
- Native AI agents with confidence scoring that learns from approvals
- OpenClaw
- Connects to any LLM (Claude, GPT-4, Gemini) via your own API keys; executes real tasks (browsing, shell, email, file management) through 13,700+ community skills on ClawHub
Human oversight
- Rills
- Built-in mobile approval queue; $0 while paused for review
- OpenClaw
- Exec approvals for high-risk commands via chat reactions or push notifications, with no confidence scoring, no learning loop, and no dedicated mobile approval queue
Integrations
- Rills
- Growing catalog (focused on common business tools)
- OpenClaw
- 50+ native integrations + 13,700+ community skills on ClawHub registry
Mobile experience
- Rills
- Approval queue designed for mobile review
- OpenClaw
- Operates through existing chat apps (WhatsApp, Telegram, iMessage) with push notifications; no purpose-built mobile approval UX
Best for
- Rills
- Teams that want AI to propose actions but humans to stay in the loop
- OpenClaw
- Technical individuals who want a self-hosted general-purpose AI assistant with full system access, not teams needing structured business workflow automation
| Compare | RillsAI automation with human oversight | OpenClawPersonal AI assistant that actually does things |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Base subscription from $29/month plus included workflow & AI credits; logic & approvals free | Open-source (MIT, self-host free) or OpenClaw Cloud at $59/mo; all LLM API costs are pass-through to your provider |
| Free / entry | Free trial; paid plans from Hobby tier (see rills.ai/pricing for tiers and included credits) | Open source: $0 to install; practical cost $6-13/mo for basic self-hosting (VPS + OSS models). See getopenclaw.ai/pricing |
| AI capabilities | Native AI agents with confidence scoring that learns from approvals | Connects to any LLM (Claude, GPT-4, Gemini) via your own API keys; executes real tasks (browsing, shell, email, file management) through 13,700+ community skills on ClawHub |
| Human oversight | Built-in mobile approval queue; $0 while paused for review | Exec approvals for high-risk commands via chat reactions or push notifications, with no confidence scoring, no learning loop, and no dedicated mobile approval queue |
| Integrations | Growing catalog (focused on common business tools) | 50+ native integrations + 13,700+ community skills on ClawHub registry |
| Mobile experience | Approval queue designed for mobile review | Operates through existing chat apps (WhatsApp, Telegram, iMessage) with push notifications; no purpose-built mobile approval UX |
| Best for | Teams that want AI to propose actions but humans to stay in the loop | Technical individuals who want a self-hosted general-purpose AI assistant with full system access, not teams needing structured business workflow automation |
When to choose Rills
- You want AI agents with confidence scoring that learns from your approvals over time
- You want a purpose-built mobile approval queue and $0 cost while workflows wait
- You prefer predictable action credit pricing over open-ended LLM API pass-through costs
- You need team-ready automation with multi-tenancy, shared workflows, and role-based access
When to choose OpenClaw
- You want a general-purpose personal AI assistant with full system access (browsing, file management, shell commands) rather than structured business workflow automation
- You prefer self-hosting with complete data control and are comfortable with DevOps and server management
- You want to interact with your AI through chat apps you already use (WhatsApp, Telegram, iMessage) rather than a dedicated workflow builder
- Open-source MIT licensing and no vendor lock-in on infrastructure is a hard requirement
Pricing comparison
Rills
Base subscription from $29/month plus included workflow & AI credits; logic & approvals free
- Hobby $29/month: 10,000 workflow credits & 1,000 AI credits/mo (included)
- Professional $99/month: 50,000 workflow & 5,000 AI credits/mo
- Business $349/month: 200,000 workflow & 20,000 AI credits/mo
- Human approvals and workflow logic never consume credits
- $0 while workflows are paused awaiting approval
- Enterprise: custom pricing and credit pools (see /pricing)
OpenClaw
Open-source (MIT, self-host free) or OpenClaw Cloud at $59/mo; all LLM API costs are pass-through to your provider
- Open source (MIT): $0 to install; self-host on any infrastructure with full data control
- Self-hosted real cost: $6-13/mo basic personal use; $25-50/mo active business workflows; $100-200+/mo heavy usage with premium LLMs
- OpenClaw Cloud (managed): $59/mo, includes hosted 24/7 agent, LLM access, chat platform integrations, persistent memory
- All LLM API costs are pass-through to your provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), with no bundled credits or predictable per-action pricing
Approve from your phone. Pause without paying.
14-day trial, no card. Plug in one workflow, watch it ask before it acts.
Automation products change tiers often. Confirm current limits and prices on each vendor's site before you buy.
Last updated: April 2026
OpenClaw is a trademark of its respective owners. Rills is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of these companies. Product information was accurate as of the date shown and may have changed. Visit each product's website for current pricing and features.